Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 14.4% lower than the long-term average. The cooling peak load was 19.9%, 22.2% lower for the 3-storey office and 10 storey office while 3.3% higher for supermarket respectively. It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke building model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 5.3% lower than the long-term average. The heating peak load was higher than the long-term average for all archetypes (42.2%, 69.0% and 9.6% for 3-storey office, 10-storey office and supermarket respectively). It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke building model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 2.4% lower than the long-term average. The cooling peak load was 5.6%, and 4.5% lower for the 3-storey office and 10 storey office while 1.5% higher for supermarket respectively. It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke building model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 10.2% lower than the long-term average. The heating peak load was 12.7%, and 12.3% higher for the 3-storey office and 10 storey office while 6.1% lower for supermarket respectively. It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke building model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 12.8% higher than the long-term average. The cooling peak load was lower than the long-term average for all archetypes (33.1%, 55.3% and 86.6% for 3-storey office, 10-storey office and supermarket respectively). It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke building model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 0.8% lower than the long-term average. The cooling peak load was higher than the long-term average for all archetypes (48.1%, 50.7% and 41.8% for 3-storey office, 10-storey office and supermarket respectively). It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke building model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 17.0% lower than the long-term average. The cooling peak load was lower than the long-term average for all archetypes (18.5%, 21.5% and 17.9% for 3-storey office, 10-storey office and supermarket respectively). It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke building model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 10.2% lower than the long-term average. The cooling peak load was higher than the long-term average for all archetypes (11.5%, 16.9% and 34.4% for 3-storey office, 10-storey office and supermarket respectively). It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke building model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 2.5% higher than the long-term average. The cooling peak load was higher than the long-term average for all archetypes (62.6%, 31.1% and 30.1% for 3-storey office, 10-storey office and supermarket respectively). It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke building model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 4.2% lower than the long-term average. The cooling peak load was 5.4%, 2% lower for the 3-storey office and 10 storey office while 0.8% higher for supermarket respectively. It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke building model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 4.3% higher than the long-term average. The cooling peak load was lower than the long-term average for all archetypes (19.4% for 3-storey office and 35.3% for 10-storey office respectively) It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke building model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 10.6% lower than the long-term average. All archetypes saw a n increase in cooling peak load. The cooling peak load was 34.4% and 45.7% for the 3-storey office and 10-storey office, respectively. It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke building model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 10.6% higher than the long-term average. The cooling peak load was 3.0%, 4.5% lower for the 3-storey office and 10-storey office while 25.0% higher for the supermarket. It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke building model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 8.3% lower than the long-term average. The cooling peak load was 2.2%, 6.5% higher for the 3-storey office and 10-storey office while 4.3% lower for the supermarket. It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke building model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 26.2% lower than the long-term average. The cooling peak load was higher than the long-term average for all archetypes (13.1%, 15.6% and 4.0% for 3-storey office, 10-storey office and supermarket respectively). It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 5.6% higher than the long-term average. The cooling peak load was 19.3% lower for 3-storey office while 2.7% higher for the supermarket. It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 16.5% lower than the long-term average. The cooling peak load was 2.1%, 2.6% lower for the 3-storey office and 10 storey office while 1.8% higher for supermarket respectively. It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 7.3% higher than the long-term average. The cooling peak load was higher than the long-term average for all archetypes (4.2% for 3-storey office and 0.3% for 10-storey office respectively) It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 12.6% higher than the long-term average. All archetypes saw a n increase in cooling peak load. The cooling peak load was 2.3%, 6.5%, and 2.9% higher for the 3-storey office, 10-storey office and supermarket, respectively. It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 8.6% higher than the long-term average. The cooling peak load was 28.5%, 28.4% lower for the 3-storey office and 10-storey office while 7.6% higher for the supermarket. It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 7.0% higher than the long-term average. The cooling peak load was 9.9%, 7.0% lower for the 3-storey office and 10-storey office while 1.4% higher for the supermarket. It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 4.8% lower than the long-term average. The cooling peak load was 36.5%, 35.2% and 10.8% higher for the 3-storey office, 10-storey office and supermarket, respectively. It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 1.1% higher than the long-term average. The cooling peak load was 12.7% lower for 3-storey office while 21.8% and 4.2% higher for the 10-storey office and supermarket, respectively. It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 6.7% higher than the long-term average. The cooling peak load was 7.5%, 7.3% and 2.2% higher for the 3-storey office, 10 storey office and supermarket respectively. It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 19.3% higher than the long-term average. The cooling peak load was 58.6%, 61.4% and 30.2% higher for the 3-storey office, 10-storey office and supermarket, respectively. It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 9.9% higher than the long-term average. All archetypes saw a decrease in cooling peak load. The cooling peak load was 0.8%, 2.9%, and 21.6% lower for the 3-storey office, 10-storey office and supermarket, respectively. It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 15.5% lower than the long-term average. The cooling peak load was 3.0%, 4.5% higher for the 3-storey office and supermarket while 16.3% lower for the 10-sotrey office. It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke model using our RTY data.

Energy Index (%)

The solar PV simulation output results were 10.1% lower than the long-term average. The cooling peak load was 1.9% higher for the 3-storey office, while 21.2% and 9.5% lower for the10-storey office and supermarket. It should be noted that peak load results are highly sensitive to the particular building and HVAC design and settings – it is more appropriate to evaluate those results from a bespoke model using our RTY data.